Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 29.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Community Psychol. 2013 Mar;51(1-2):222–231. doi: 10.1007/s10464-012-9536-4

Table 3.

Correlations between CLI-based general capacity scores and ES efforts and outputs

ES efforts & outputs Coalition-rated capacity dimensions [r (95 % CI)]
Mobilization Structure Task Cohesion Implementation planning
# of enforcement hours .02 (−.52, .54) −.27 (−.70, .30) .26 (−.31, .69) −.20 (−.66, .37) .15 (−.41, .63)
# Arrests −.30 (−.72, .27) −.31 (−.72, .26) .04 (−.50, .56) −.31 (−.72, .26) .19 (−.38, .65)
# Hours policy .43 (−.13, .78)* .44 (−.12, .79)* .56 (.04, .84)** .52 (−.01, .82)* .54 (.01, .83)**
# Policy changes .18 (−.39, .65) −.10 (−.60, .45) .29 (−.28, .71) .04 (−.50, .56) .25 (−.32, .69)
# Hours media
# Hours media .12 (−.44, .61) −.12 (−.61, .44) .31 (−.26, .72) .33 (−.24, .73) .20 (−.37, .66)
Group TA .03 (−.51, .55) .22 (−.35, .67) .20 (−.37, .66) −.04 (−.56, .50) .24 (−.33, .68)
Sessions −.43 (−.78, .13)* −.42 (−.78, .14)* −.56 (−.84, −.04)** −.31 (−.72, .26) −.13 (−.62, .43)
*

p < .10,

**

p < .05.

Time 1 CLI capacity scores were used to examine the relationship with TTA utilization during the grant; Time 6 CLI capacity ratings were used to examine the relationship with ES efforts and outputs, 1-tailed tests conducted