Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 29.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Community Psychol. 2013 Mar;51(1-2):222–231. doi: 10.1007/s10464-012-9536-4

Table 6.

General coalition capacity (overall description: coalitions must develop general capacities to function effectively as coalitions)

3 = High
functioning: strong
and sustainable
2 = Moderate
functioning: more
likely to be effective
than not
1 = Low functioning:
not likely to be
effective or
sustainable
Meets or exceeds all or most of these standards:
  • Strong, skilled, leadership

  • Well-run meetings

  • Consistently compliant with reporting requirements

  • Low staff turnover

  • Substantial membership with relatively low turnover

  • Established coalition visibility in the community

  • Technological capacity

Meets or exceeds more than half of these standards:
  • Adequate leadership skills

  • Meetings usually run OK

  • Motivated to meet reporting requirements and usually compliant

  • Staff turnover is not a major source of problems

  • Enough members to function adequately

  • Working toward community visibility

  • Technological capacity with technical assistance

Meets half or less of the standards:
  • Leadership weak and/ or unskilled

  • Meetings not usually well organized

  • Frequently non-compliant with reporting requirements

  • Staff turnover is a problem

  • Inadequate membership

  • Not known in the community

  • Low technological capacity