Table 2.
Random State-Level Effects of Future Orientation on HIV Prevalence
| State | Intercept | β |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama | −0.13 | −0.22 |
| Arizona | 0.04 | −0.09 |
| Arkansas | 0.00 | −0.12 |
| California | −0.07 | −0.26 |
| Colorado | −0.03 | −0.52 |
| Connecticut | −0.06 | −0.50 |
| Delaware | −0.07 | −0.49 |
| Florida | −0.06 | −0.85 |
| Georgia | −0.02 | −0.11 |
| Hawaii | 0.03 | −0.14 |
| Idaho | 0.05 | −0.02 |
| Illinois | 0.05 | 0.11 |
| Indiana | 0.06 | −0.07 |
| Iowa | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| Maryland | −0.66 | −2.68 |
| Massachusetts | 0.04 | −0.27 |
| Michigan | 0.02 | 0.06 |
| Minnesota | 0.02 | −0.06 |
| Mississippi | −0.14 | −0.38 |
| Missouri | 0.10 | −0.14 |
| Montana | 0.05 | −0.05 |
| Nebraska | 0.05 | 0.00 |
| Nevada | −0.02 | −0.34 |
| New Hampshire | 0.02 | −0.14 |
| New Jersey | −0.11 | −0.67 |
| New Mexico | 0.07 | −0.07 |
| New York | 0.18 | 0.05 |
| North Carolina | 0.03 | −0.21 |
| Ohio | 0.05 | 0.01 |
| Oklahoma | 0.04 | −0.05 |
| Oregon | −0.02 | −0.24 |
| Pennsylvania | 0.08 | −0.19 |
| Rhode Island | −0.01 | −0.16 |
| South Carolina | 0.01 | −0.27 |
| Tennessee | 0.13 | −0.08 |
| Texas | −0.06 | −0.12 |
| Utah | 0.03 | −0.02 |
| Vermont | 0.05 | −0.08 |
| Virginia | 0.07 | −0.11 |
| Washington | −0.03 | −0.19 |
| West Virginia | 0.09 | −0.01 |
| Wisconsin | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Wyoming | 0.06 | −0.03 |
Note. Random effects are from a multi-level model where slopes and intercepts for future oriented language were allowed to vary randomly between states.