Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 29;12(9):e0185587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185587

Table 5. The performance of our method and other existing methods on PDB594 dataset (Jackknife test evaluation).

Methods ACC(%) MCC SN(%) SP(%)
GNB-based-wrapper 80.5 0.610 82.8 78.1
DT-based-wrapper 69.2 0.384 68.4 70.0
LongR-based-wrapper 75.4 0.511 80.5 70.4
KNN-based-wrapper 74.6 0.492 72.1 77.1
SVM-Poly-based-wrapper 77.1 0.550 85.5 68.7
SVM-RBF-based-wrapper 80.1 0.605 84.8 75.4
Our method 86.2 0.724 87.2 85.2