Table 6. The performance of our method and other existing methods on PDB186 dataset.
Methods | ACC(%) | MCC | SN(%) | SP(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
IDNA-Prot|dis | 72.0 | 0.445 | 79.5 | 64.5 |
IDNA-Prot | 67.2 | 0.344 | 67.7 | 66.7 |
DNA-Prot | 61.8 | 0.240 | 69.9 | 53.8 |
DNAbinder | 60.8 | 0.216 | 57.0 | 64.5 |
DNABIND | 67.7 | 0.355 | 66.7 | 68.8 |
DNA-Threader | 59.7 | 0.279 | 23.7 | 95.7 |
DBPPred | 76.9 | 0.538 | 79.6 | 74.2 |
iDNAPro = PseAAC-EL | 71.5 | 0.442 | 82.8 | 60.2 |
Kmer1+ACC | 71.0 | 0.431 | 82.8 | 59.1 |
Local-DPP(n = 3,λ = 1) | 79.0 | 0.625 | 92.5 | 65.6 |
Local-DPP(n = 2,λ = 2) | 77.4 | 0.568 | 90.3 | 64.5 |
Our method | 76.3 | 0.557 | 92.5 | 60.2 |
PDB1075 serves as training dataset and PDB186 is applied as test dataset.