Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 29;12(9):e0185657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185657

Fig 3. Scatter plots comparing conventional echo RV parameters in relation to CMR RVEF.

Fig 3

Whereas all echo indices correlated with volumetric RVEF (p<0.001), RV-GLS (upper left) yielded higher correlations than did TAPSE, RV-S’ or FAC.