Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 31;6(4):e1189–e1194. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.04.006

Table 3.

Advantages and Disadvantages Associated With Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Autograft Versus Hamstring Autograft Versus Quadriceps Tendon Autograft for ACLR

Advantages Disadvantages
Patellar tendon • Gold standard
• Better restoration of Lachman, pivot shift, and instrumented laxity testing compared with hamstring autografts
• Earlier healing for bone to bone healing
• Anterior knee pain
• Risk of patella fracture
• Risk of patellar tendon rupture
• Subject to graft-tunnel mismatch (can be avoided with intraoperative adjustments, however)
Hamstring • Less anterior knee pain
• Strongest biomechanical graft at time = 0
• More cosmetic
• Advantageous for transphyseal ACLR in the pediatric population
• Potential for small graft diameters (especially in females)
• Potential for increased graft laxity over time
• Longer healing for soft-tissue to bone
Quadriceps • Large cross-sectional area, can be helpful for revision ACLR in the setting of expanded bone tunnels
• Excellent biomechanical strength compared with native ACL
• Bone to bone healing on one end, with soft tissue on the other that may be advantageous for transphyseal ACLR in the pediatric population
• Anterior knee pain
• Risk of patella fracture
• Risk of patellar tendon rupture
• Lack of long-term clinical studies

ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; ACLR, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.