Table 3.
Kd (nM) | Reaction | Microrates (on; nM−1s−1/off; s−1) | Manipulations |
---|---|---|---|
Ki | Integrin complex formation | k 2 /k 1 | Kp > Ki |
increase in ligand affinity after aggregation | |||
Kc | Filling divalent unpaired receptor | k 4 /k 3 | Kc = 0.01 Ki decreased unpaired receptor Keq for binding 2nd ligand |
Ka | Empty receptor pairing with bound receptor | k 6 /k 5 | Ka > 0 |
aggregation constant drives positive cooperativity | |||
Kp | Population of empty paired receptors | k 10 /k 9 | Kp > Ki |
increase in ligand affinity after aggregation | |||
Kp = 100 Kx decreased aggregate receptor Keq for binding 2nd ligand | |||
Kx | Receptor saturation | k 8 /k 7 | Kp = 100 Kx decreased aggregate receptor Keq for binding 2nd ligand |
Microrate parameters are derived from published values and set to implement positive cooperativity for sequential ligand binding and receptor aggregation. The rates for integrin complex formation (Ki) are set to simulate an increase in ligand affinity post-aggregation. Populating an empty unpaired receptor is set with a hundredth fold decrease in Keq for binding the second ligand. The aggregation equilibrium constant is set at ten times the equilibrium constant for initial complex formation to allow for aggregation to drive positive cooperativity. The population of empty paired receptors dictates an increase in ligand affinity after aggregation and is set to decrease aggregate receptor Keq for binding second ligand for receptor saturation. These parameters are adapted from Wanant et al.28, and applied here to simulate positive cooperativity in receptor aggregation pairing so that the model can be initialized and implemented with proteomic data to evaluate binding profiles.