Table 6.
Estimated results for binary choice model using diabetes as dependent variable
| Variable | OLS | Logit | Probit | Skewed Logit | Mixed effect Logit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obesity dummy | 0.065* | 0.719* | 0.307 | 0.697 | 0.719* |
| Marriage status | 0.241* | 1.660 | 0.978 | 1.434 | 1.660 |
| Hypertension dummy | 0.056* | 0.764* | 0.361 | 0.693 | 0.764* |
| Gender dummy | −0.038* | −0.670 | −0.374 | −0.607 | −0.670 |
| Ln(house building area) | −0.059** | −1.300** | −0.571** | −1.247** | −1.300** |
| Ln(income per month) | 0.013 | 0.329 | 0.187 | 0.301 | 0.329 |
| Constant | 0.239 | 0.570 | −0.336 | −12.827 | 0.570 |
| F /LR(Wald) test for all variables | 3.06*** | 14.26** | 13.5** | 11.74** | |
| R square/Pseudo R square | 0.67 | 0.14 | 0.14 | ||
| Adjusted R square | 0.51 | ||||
| Log likelihood | −42.85 | −43.23 | −42.62 | −42.85 |
Note: The null hypothesis for F or LR test is that the concerned coefficients are jointly equal to zero
*, **, and *** give the coefficients’ significance indicated by estimated standard errors at 10%, 5% and 1% level individually