Table 1.

Comparison of radiological results

	Pohle-mann et al. [8]	Matta and Tornetta [9]	Tornetta and Matta [10]	Tornetta et al. [11]	Suzuki et al. [12]	S.A Khaled [13]	This series
Excellent %	63	67	75	76	51	71,4	80%
Good %	24	28		21	23	20,8	0
Acceptable %	13	4		3	16	7,8	20%
Poor %	0	1		0	10	0	0