Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 26;8:1679. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01679

Table 2.

QTL detected in SC NILs for soluble solids content (SSC) (°Bx), sucrose (SUC), fructose (FRU), glucose (GLU), citrate (CIT), and malate (MAL) content (mg g−1 fresh weight) and comparison to trait values in PS.

QTL namea Chr Start interval (Mb)b End interval (Mb) Trait valuec Change relative to PS (%)
NIL PS
sscqsc1.5_CAM 1 33.3 34.7* 9.1 ± 1.4 11.9 ± 1.2 −23.3
sscqsc2.1_CAM 2 0 1.4 8.9 ± 1.7 11.9 ± 1.2 −25.2
sucqsc2.1_CAM 2 30.3 ± 5.9 48 ± 8.7 −36.9
sscqsc3.2_CAM 3 2.8 15.4 8.8 ± 2 11.9 ± 1.2 −25.8
sucqsc3.2_CAM 3 28.3 ± 16.7 48 ± 8.7 −41
sscqsc3.5_VAL11 3 21.1 27 13 ± 1.2 10.6 ± 0.4 23
sscqsc4.1_CAM 4 3.9 14.3 8.2 ± 0.8 11.9 ± 1.2 −31.4
sscqsc4.1_VAL11 4 7.4 ± 1.0 10.6 ± 0.4 −30.2
sucqsc4.1_CAM 4 25.8 ± 5.1 48 ± 8.7 −46.2
sucqsc4.1_VAL11 4 25.7 ± 8.3 48 ± 4.0 −40.4
gluqsc4.1_VAL11 4 14.9 ± 2.5 11.1 ± 0.8 27.6
sscqsc4.3_CAM 4 3.9 27.4 9.0 ± 0.5 11.9 ± 1.2 −24.7
sscqsc5.1_CAM 5 0.3 1.7 8.7 ± 0.7 11.9 ± 1.2 −26.9
sscqsc5.1_CDM 5 7.9 ± 1.6 10.5 ± 1.3 −27.3
sscqsc5.1_VAL11 5 6.9 ± 1.2 10.6 ± 0.4 −34.7
sucqsc5.1_VAL11 5 14 ± 6.4 48 ± 4.0 −67.5
fruqsc5.1_VAL11 5 12.4 ± 1.2 7.9 ± 0.7 47.1
gluqsc5.1_VAL11 5 16.4 ± 1.3 11.1 ± 0.8 40.3
sscqsc5.2_CAM 5 0.3 5.9* 7.6 ± 0.9 11.9 ± 1.2 −36.1
sscqsc5.2_CDM 5 8.4 ± 1.4 10.5 ± 1.3 −21.9
sucqsc5.2_CAM 5 21.4 ± 9.8 48 ± 8.7 −55.4
sucqsc5.4_CAM 5 27.3 28.1 28.6 ± 8.7 −40.4
fruqsc6.2_VAL11 6 0.5 5.3 11.4 ± 1.2 7.9 ± 0.7 35.7
gluqsc6.2_VAL11 6 15.6 ± 2.0 11.1 ± 0.8 33.5
fruqsc6.4_CAM 6 0.5 30.6 10.2 ± 1.0 14.3 ± 2.5 −27.9
sscqsc6.4_CAM 6 8.5 ± 1.3 11.9 ± 1.2 −28.3
fruqsc6.6_VAL11 6 33.1 35.6 10.8 ± 1.0 7.9 ± 0.7 28.2
sscqsc7.1_CAM 7 2.4 6.6 10.3 ± 0.3 11.9 ± 1.2 −13.5
sscqsc7.3_CAM 7 13 22.3 8.5 ± 0.5 11.9 ± 1.2 −28.3
sucqsc7.3_CAM 7 30.6 ± 5.6 48 ± 8.7 −36.3
fruqsc7.3_VAL11 7 11.8 ± 1.3 7.9 ± 0.7 40.8
gluqsc7.3_VAL11 7 15.6 ± 1.6 11.1 ± 0.8 33.6
citqsc7.3_CAM 7 2 ± 0.7 3.7 ± 1.2 −45.2
sscqsc7.4_VAL11 7 13 25.5 8.2 ± 0.7 10.6 ± 0.4 −23
sucqsc7.4_VAL11 7 25.6 ± 7.4 48 ± 4.0 −40.7
fruqsc7.4_VAL11 7 12.3 ± 2.2 7.9 ± 0.7 46.7
gluqsc7.4_VAL11 7 16.8 ± 2.9 11.1 ± 0.8 43.3
citqsc8.1_CDM 8 0.3 5.3 0.6 ± 0.3 2.7 ± 0.9 −78
malqsc8.1_CDM 8 1.8 ± 0.5 0.5 ± 0.5 252
citqsc8.2_CDM 8 1.6 14.9* 0.7 ± 0.6 2.7 ± 0.9 −74.2
malqsc8.2_CDM 8 1.8 ± 0.4 0.5 ± 0.5 245.7
fruqsc8.2_CAM 8 10.6 ± 1.7 14.3 ± 2.5 −25.5
gluqsc8.2_CAM 8 8.9 ± 3.5 17.9 ± 2.6 −50.5
sucqsc8.3_CAM 8 6.1 29.5 33.4 ± 10.9 48 ± 8.7 −30.4
fruqsc8.4_VAL11 8 19.3 32.5 12.9 ± 3.7 7.9 ± 0.7 53.8
gluqsc8.4_VAL11 8 15.2 ± 3.8 11.1 ± 0.8 29.8
gluqsc9.1_VAL11 9 0.1 4.2* 14.2 ± 1.5 21.1
citqsc10.3_CAM 10 3.4 4.7 2.3 ± 0.8 3.7 ± 1.2 −37.6
malqsc11.1_CAM 11 2.5 3.7 0.03 ± 0.01 0.01 184.8
sscqsc11.2_CAM 11 1.2 25.4 7.7 ± 1.2 11.9 ± 1.2 −35.7
sucqsc11.2_CAM 11 22.0 ± 5.7 48 ± 8.7 −54.2
fruqsc11.2_VAL11 11 12.1 ± 2.4 7.9 ± 0.7 44.4
gluqsc11.2_VAL11 11 16.7 ± 3.1 11.1 ± 0.8 42.3
gluqsc11.4_CDM 11 17.6 30.7 28.7 ± 2.4 18.2 ± 6.9 58.3
sscqsc12.1_CAM 12 5.1 23.6 8.5 ± 2.3 11.9 ± 1.2 −29.4
a

Names of QTL are assigned based on the measured trait: SSC, SUC, FRU, GLU, CIT, and MAL, followed by a “q” designating QTL, an abbreviation of its origin as Songwhan Charmi (sc), then by a number indicating the NIL in which it was detected, and then the location and year of trial (see text).

b

Start and end intervals in megabases (Mb) on target chromosome (Chr) pseudomolecule according to genome version 3.5.1.

c

Units for SSC are expressed in °Bx; for SUC, FRU, GLU, CIT, and MAL, trait values are expressed in mg g−1 fresh weight.

*

Includes portion of the interval in heterozygosis.

Trait means ± SD.