Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 2;7(5):e015476. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015476

Table 2.

Risk of chronic lung diseases among three exposed groups compared with the non-exposed group

Variables Non-exposed group Fetal-exposed group Infant-exposed group Preschool-exposed group
Severely affected famine area
 Prevalence (%) 5.6 5.6 10.4 5.6
 p* 0.973 0.022 0.983
 OR (95% CI)* Ref. 0.99 (0.53 to 1.84) 1.95 (1.10 to 3.44) 0.99 (0.60 to 1.66)
 p 0.953 0.009 0.437
 OR (95% CI) Ref. 0.98 (0.43 to 2.20) 2.57 (1.26 to 5.25) 0.75 (0.36 to 1.56)
Less severely affected famine area
 Prevalence (%) 6.4 6.9 6.4 7.6
 p* 0.691 0.964 0.336
 OR (95% CI)* Ref. 1.09 (0.71 to 1.66) 1.01 (0.60 to 1.70) 1.21 (0.82 to 1.76)
 p 0.254 0.398 0.471
 OR (95% CI) Ref. 1.38 (0.79 to 2.41) 1.33 (0.69 to 3.56) 1.22 (0.71 to 2.10)
p for interaction between area and group* Ref. 0.468 0.109 0.178
p for interaction between area and group Ref. 0.421 0.061 0.223

*Single variance binary logistic regression model.

†Multivariable logistic regression model, adjusted for gender, smoking, drinking, family economic status and the highest educational attainment of parents.