Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 18;7(9):e016062. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016062

Table 4.

AUCs, optimal cut-off, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for the anthropometric indices in ROC analysis for predicting MetS

Anthropometric Indices AUC (95% CI) p Cut-off Sensitivity Specificity Youden Index PPV NPV
Male
 WC 0.76 (0.67 to 0.84) <0.001 84.0 0.95 0.54 0.49 0.56 0.95
 BMI 0.77 (0.68 to 0.85) <0.001 24.94 0.69 0.75 0.44 0.63 0.80
 WHR 0.73 (0.64 to 0.81) <0.001 0.89 0.76 0.64 0.40 0.56 0.81
 ABSI 0.58*(0.49 to 0.68) 0.149 0.0822 0.29 0.88 0.17 0.60 0.67
 AVI 0.76 (0.67 to 0.84) <0.001 14.25 0.95 0.54 0.49 0.56 0.95
 BAI 0.59*(0.49 to 0.68) 0.124 27.44 0.40 0.87 0.27 0.65 0.70
 BRI 0.74 (0.65 to 0.82) <0.001 3.47 0.81 0.58 0.39 0.54 0.83
 CI 0.67*(0.58 to 0.76) <0.001 1.21 0.83 0.45 0.28 0.48 0.81
 VAI 0.65*(0.55 to 0.74) 0.005 1.06 0.83 0.48 0.31 0.49 0.82
Female
 WC 0.71 (0.64 to 0.79) <0.001 80.0 0.82 0.60 0.42 0.39 0.91
 BMI 0.71 (0.63 to 0.78) <0.001 25.14 0.59 0.78 0.37 0.46 0.86
 WHR 0.68 (0.59 to 0.75) <0.001 0.81 0.91 0.37 0.28 0.31 0.93
 ABSI 0.55*(0.47 to 0.64) 0.358 0.0799 0.32 0.81 0.13 0.35 0.79
 AVI 0.72 (0.64 to 0.79) <0.001 13.03 0.82 0.60 0.42 0.39 0.91
 BAI 0.64 (0.56 to 0.72) 0.013 30.38 0.53 0.74 0.27 0.39 0.83
 BRI 0.71 (0.63 to 0.79) <0.001 3.58 0.71 0.66 0.37 0.40 0.88
 CI 0.63 (0.54 to 0.71) 0.020 1.23 0.44 0.81 0.25 0.42 0.82
 VAI 0.66 (0.58 to 0.74) 0.001 1.36 0.79 0.52 0.31 0.34 0.89

DeLong. Delong. Clarke-Pearson’s nonparametric approach was used to compare the AUCs of indices.

*Compared with the AUC of waist circumference, p is less than 0.05.

ABSI, a body shape index; AUC, area under curve; AVI, abdominal volume index; BAI, body adiposity index; BMI, body mass index; BRI, body roundness index; CI, conicity; MetS, metabolic syndrome; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; VAI, visceral adiposity index; WC, waist circumference; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio.