Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 25;7(9):e015363. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015363

Table 3.

Time series analysis describing the trends in the evolution of the proportion of patients with NVAF treated with anticoagulants, aspirin or other AP therapy alone or without any antithrombotic treatment from April 2012 to April 2015 in the UK by time since NVAF diagnosis

Pre-ESC* Post-ESC† Post-NICE†
β SE p Value β SE p Value β SE p Value
A. Anticoagulation treatment
Diagnosed <12 months
 Level 43.09 0.26 <0.0001 0.28 0.35 0.418 0.10 0.49 0.846
 Trend 0.34 0.02 <0.0001 0.26 0.03 <0.0001 0.12 0.09 0.171
Diagnosed ≥12 months
 Level 49.01 0.07 <0.0001 0.00 0.10 0.981 −0.16 0.14 0.251
 Trend 0.13 0.01 <0.0001 0.18 0.01 <0.0001 0.15 0.02 <0.0001
B. Aspirin (ASA) or other AP only
Diagnosed <12 months
 Level 41.94 0.24 <0.0001 −0.20 0.31 0.518 −0.63 0.44 0.159
 Trend −0.36 0.02 <0.0001 −0.26 0.03 <0.0001 −0.10 0.08 0.226
Diagnosed ≥12 months
 Level 35.05 0.06 <0.0001 0.03 0.08 0.737 −0.33 0.12 0.008
 Trend −0.12 0.01 <0.0001 −0.15 0.01 <0.0001 −0.21 0.02 <0.0001
C. Without any antithrombotic treatment
Diagnosed <12 months
 Level 14.97 0.15 <0.0001 −0.08 0.19 0.6835 0.54 0.27 0.057
 Trend 0.02 0.01 0.211 0.00 0.02 0.9262 −0.03 0.05 0.612
Diagnosed ≥12 months
 Level 15.94 0.07 <0.0001 −0.03 0.10 0.789 0.49 0.14 0.001
 Trend −0.01 0.01 0.174 −0.03 0.01 0.000 0.06 0.02 0.015

*Pre-ESC data are base level, base trend.

†Post-ESC and post-NICE data are change in level, change in trend.

AP, antiplatelet; ESC, European Society of Cardiology; NICE, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; NVAF, non-valvular atrial fibrillation.