Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 24;7(9):e016332. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016332

Table 3.

IRR and 95% CI from multivariable models by ethnic group, for all cancers and by diagnostic group, 0–29 years, Yorkshire, 1998–2009

Ethnic classification and group All cancers Leukaemia Lymphoma CNS tumours
IRR (95% CI) IRR (95% CI) IRR (95% CI) IRR (95% CI)
HES
 White 1 1 1 1
 South Asian 0.90 (0.79 to 1.02) 0.85 (0.64 to 1.13) 1.04 (0.79 to 1.38) 0.73 (0.53 to 1.01)
 Other 1.32 (1.13 to 1.53) 0.79 (0.52 to 1.21) 1.46 (1.05 to 2.04) 1.30 (0.92 to 1.85)
Onomap
 White 1 1 1 1
 South Asian 0.89 (0.79 to 1.00) 0.84 (0.64 to 1.12) 1.18 (0.92 to 1.50) 0.65 (0.47 to 0.91)
 Other 1.09 (0.93 to 1.27) 1.08 (0.76 to 1.54) 0.97 (0.66 to 1.41) 1.15 (0.80 to 1.65)
CHP
 White 1 1 1 1
 South Asian 0.95 (0.84 to 1.07) 1.01 (0.78 to 1.31) 1.10 (0.86 to 1.42) 0.70 (0.50 to 0.96)
 Other 1.41 (1.23 to 1.62) 0.98 (0.68 to 1.43) 1.50 (1.10 to 2.04) 1.43 (1.03 to 1.98)
COP
 White 1 1 1 1
 South Asian 1.07 (0.96 to 1.20) 1.05 (0.81 to 1.35) 1.36 (1.08 to 1.71) 0.78 (0.57 to 1.05)
 Other 0.78 (0.65 to 0.94) 0.67 (0.43 to 1.05) 0.72 (0.47 to 1.12) 0.93 (0.62 to 1.38)

Models adjusted for age group, sex and year.

CHP, ‘Combined HES priority’; CNS, central nervous system; COP, ‘Combined Onomap priority’; HES, Hospital Episode Statistics; IRR, incidence rate ratio.