Table 1.
Reference | Dietary data collection period | Country | Cohort name | Total n* | Dietary assessment | FFQ items | Exposure variable | Exposure variable scale |
Barker et al 30 | 1990–1992 | UK | ALSPAC | 6979 | FFQ | 103 | ‘Healthy’ and ‘unhealthy’ patterns, grouped using CFA | Dietary patterns as continuous variable |
Bernard et al 43 | 2003–2005 | France | Eden cohort | 1335 | FFQ | 137 | Estimated maternal intake of total n6 and total n3 (in g/d), then calculation of n6:n3 fatty acid ratio | Fatty acid ratio as continuous variable |
Bolduc et al 44 | 2008–2012 | Canada | CHILD Edmonton subcohort | 688 | FFQ | 175 | Total fruit intake estimated from FFQ | Maternal fruit intake as continuous predictor of neurodevelopment |
Daniels et al 31 | 1990–1992 | UK | ALSPAC | 7421 | FFQ | 103 | Maternal fish intake as servings/week | Categorical variable; four intake groups (of which one referent group) |
Davidson et al 32 | 2001–2002 | Seychelles | Seychelles Child Development Study | 229 | FFQ and 4 day diet diary | NS | Maternal fish intake as g/day | Maternal fish intake as continuous variable |
Gale et al 33 | 1991–1992 | UK | NS | 217 | FFQ | 100 | Maternal fish intake as times eaten/week | Categorical variable; three intake groups (of which one referent group) |
Gustafsson et al 45 | NS | USA | Ongoing longitudinal study | 48 | ASA24† | NS | Total and saturated fat intake | Fat intake as continuous variable |
Hibbeln et al 34 | 1990–1992 | UK | ALSPAC | 11 875 | FFQ | 103 | Maternal seafood intake as g/week | Categorical variable; three intake groups (of which one referent group) |
Jacka et al 35 | 2002–2008 | Norway | MoBa | 23 020 | validated FFQ | 255 | ‘Healthy’ and ‘unhealthy’ data driven dietary pattern scores | Dietary patterns scores as continuous variables |
Julvez et al 46 | 2004–2008 | Spain | INMA | 1892 | FFQ | 101 | Maternal seafood intake | Maternal seafood intake as Quintiles |
Mendez et al 36 | 1997–1998 | Menorca | Prospective birth cohort | 392 | FFQ | 42 | Maternal fish intake | Categorical variable; four intake groups (of which one referent group) |
Oken et al 37 | 1999–2002 | USA | Project Viva | 341 | validated FFQ | >140 | Maternal fish intake | Categorical variable; three intake groups (of which one referent group) |
Oken et al 38 | 1997–2003 | Denmark | Danish birth cohort | 25 446 | Validated FFQ | >360 | Maternal fish intake as servings(g)/week | Categorical variable; three quintiles of intake (lowest, middle, highest) |
Oken et al 47 | 1999–2002 | USA | Project Viva | 1068 | validated FFQ | >140 | Maternal fish intake | Categorical variable; three intake groups (of which one (no fish) referent group) |
Pina-Camacho et al 39 | 1990–1992 | UK | ALSPAC | 7814 | FFQ | 103 | General unhealthy diet (second-order latent factor) generated with CFA | Unhealthy dietary pattern as continuous variable |
Sagiv et al 42 | 1993–1998 | USA | New Bedford cohort | 362 | FFQ | NS | Maternal fish intake, expressed as total servings/week | Maternal fish intake as continuous variable |
Steenweg-de Graaff et al 40 | 2001–2006 | Netherlands | Generation R | 3104 | Validated FFQ | 293 | ‘Healthy’ and ‘unhealthy’ data driven dietary pattern scores | Dietary patterns scores as continuous variables |
Valent et al 41 | 2007–2009 | Italy | Set within project (PHIME) | 606 | FFQ (Adapted from a validated FFQ) | 138 | Maternal fish intake as servings/week | Maternal fish intake as continuous variable |
*Differs from total n used in analysis (due to missing data, excluded participants, twin births, and so on).
†Automated Self-Administered 24 hours (ASA24) Dietary Assessment Tool.
CFA, confirmatory factor analysis; FFQ, food frequency questionnaire.