Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 24;7(9):e016777. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016777

Table 3.

REM statistics for separate meta-analyses for overall summary effect size, cognitive domain and affective domain, including test for heterogeneity

# Outcome Model type Ns Np Hedges’ g SE z p Value df Q Qp I2 (%)
1 Summary Effect Size Original REM 26 63 861* 0.112 0.023 4.9 0.0001 25 102 <0.0001 69
REM with SE as moderator 0.079 0.029 4 0.0065 24 93 <0.0001 68
REM with trim and fill 35† 0.075 0.019 2.7 <0.0001 34 150 <0.0001 75
2 Cognitive domain Original REM 13 29 269 0.14 0.016 8.5 <0.0001 12 12 0.451 27
REM with SE as moderator 0.132 0.030 4.3 <0.0001 11 12 0.3836 29
REM with trim and fill 0.140 0.017 8.2 <0.0001 12 12 0.4510 27
3 Affective domain Original REM 13 38 219 0.093 0.034 2.7 0.03 12 67 <0.0001 77
REM with SE as moderator 0.043 0.041 1.1 0.2935 11 57 <0.0001 74
REM with trim and fill 14† 0.088 0.028 3.1 0.0018 13 68 <0.0001 76

*Not the sum across the two domains as some studies are included in both domains.

†Includes original and imputed studies.

Ns, number of included studies; Np, number of total included participants; REM, random-effects model.