. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Atten Disord. 2017 Apr 19;22(9 Suppl):38S–48S. doi: 10.1177/1087054717700977

Table 3.

Self-Efficacy, Stratified By ADHD/LNCG Status and SU/A Group

Self-Efficacy					Overall Model	ADHD vs. LNCG	SU/A Group
	Abstainers	Desisters	Persisters		Overall Model	ADHD vs. LNCG	SU/A Group

	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)	Mean (SD)	df	F (p)	F (p)	F (p)
				3, 56	4.7 (<.001)	0.3 (0.55)	11.4 (<.0001)
ADHD	2.4 (1.4)^a	1.6 (0.7)	0.8 (0.7)^b
LNCG	2.6 (0.9)^a	1.6 (0.9)	1.0 (1.0)^b

Different alphabetic characters in superscripts (e.g, ^{a, b}) within each 3 × 2 comparison denote significant differences (with p’s values ranging from <.05 to .001 marked in bold) in post-hoc pairwise contrasts. Cells with any superscript in common do not differ from each other. Means with no superscripts do not differ from any others.