Mapping and formalising theory—providing conceptual frameworks |
Modelling helps provide a conceptual framework (for self or others) |
What are the key entities and processes required to model bTB and how might we formulate them in the most conceptually useful way? |
Conceptual clarity of key entities and processes and formalisation of these |
Begin with informal understanding or verbal theory; obtain a precise formal representation of the theory (a full model) or of concepts and subcomponents of it |
Are there similar concepts in associated areas that could apply (e.g., how does reproductive potential relate to R0)? (9) |
|
Exploring theory—exploring possibilities |
A model formalising theory is used to constrain relationships between entities so that system behaviours can be explored |
Is infection invasion success dependent on spatial clustering? (10) |
Accurate representation of relevant aspects of the theory in the model |
Begin with a model that formalises theory; obtain a set of possible behaviours given those processes |
What is the probability of bTB persisting in cattle herds of different sizes? (11) |
No explicit use of data is required |
|
Building theory—generating hypotheses and explanations |
The structure of the formalised model focuses our attention on particular processes and parameters, changes to which constitute testable hypotheses |
Following the 10-year randomised badger culling trial, bTB incidence in cattle decreased in the badger culling area, but increased in adjoining areas (12) |
Observing the way structures and parameters suggest model reformulations |
Begin with an observation or data; obtain precise hypotheses. NB: theory building often conducted iteratively with theory testing (below) |
The 1967–1968 UK foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) epidemic was characterised by rapid early spread followed by slower later spread (13) |
|
Testing theory—identifying mechanisms |
To generate empirically relevant and measurable predictions, for the purpose of falsification |
Does the incorporation of transmission heterogeneity allow us to better explain the data? (14) |
Incorporation of mechanisms into a model in ways that allow us to establish whether observed phenomena can be reproduced; structural equivalence between data and model outputs |
Begin with a model that encapsulates a theory; obtain predictions that can be compared with data to help pinpoint incorrect mechanisms |
|
Applying theory—generating accurate predictions |
To make forecasts, predict responses under intervention, and examine counterfactual scenarios |
How might FMD epidemiological dynamics have differed under alternative culling scenarios during the 2001 FMD outbreak? (15) |
Ensuring key mechanisms are replicated as closely as required to accurately reproduce real-world phenomena and data |
Begin with a model that is assumed to be true; obtain hindcasts/forecasts, and predictions relating to counterfactuals and other systems |
What difference might incursion location and speed of deployment make to the effectiveness of FMD reactive ring vaccination? (16) |