Table 4.
Prevalence of Low 25(OH)D or High PTH |
Difference in 25(OH)D or PTH Levels |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Prevalence Ratio (95%CI) P value |
Difference (95%CI) P value |
|||
| ||||
Exposure | Unadjusted | Adjusted1,2 | Unadjusted | Adjusted1 |
25(OH)D ≤ 20 ng/mL | 25(OH)D (ng/mL) | |||
Model 1A | Model 1B2 | Model 7A | Model 7B | |
PHIV vs. PHEU | 1.24 (0.99,1.54) | 1.00 (0.81,1.24) | −0.77 (−2.05,0.51) | 0.48 (−0.69,1.65) |
0.06 | 0.98 | 0.24 | 0.42 | |
Model 2A | Model 2B | Model 8A | Model 8B | |
PHIV EFV+ vs. PHEU3 | 1.52 (1.14,2.03) | 1.30 (0.98,1.74) | −2.83 (−4.93, −0.72) | −1.94 (−3.88,0.01) |
0.01 | 0.07 | 0.008 | 0.05 | |
PHIV EFV− vs. PHEU3 | 1.17 (0.93,1.48) | 0.95 (0.76,1.18) | −0.31 (−1.64,1.01) | 0.99 (−0.23,2.21) |
0.17 | 0.63 | 0.643 | 0.11 | |
Model 3A | Model 3B | Model 9A | Model 9B | |
PHIV TDF+ vs. PHEU3 | 1.09 (0.79,1.51) | 0.77 (0.56,1.06) | −1.20 (−3.16,0.75) | 1.02 (−0.87,2.92) |
0.61 | 0.10 | 0.23 | 0.29 | |
PHIV TDF− vs. PHEU3 | 1.28 (1.02,1.6) | 1.06 (0.86,1.31) | −0.65 (−1.99,0.70) | 0.37 (−0.85,1.59) |
0.03 | 0.58 | 0.35 | 0.55 | |
| ||||
PTH > 65 pg/mL | PTH (pg/mL) | |||
Model 4A | Model 4B | Model 10A | Model 10B | |
PHIV vs. PHEU | 3.80 (1.52,9.51) | 3.17 (1.25,8.06) | 7.10 (4.17,10.02) | 5.26 (2.35,8.17) |
0.004 | 0.01 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
Model 5A | Model 5B | Model 11A | Model 11B | |
PHIV EFV+ vs. PHEU3 | 1.13 (0.22,5.69) | 0.85 (0.17,4.56) | 5.44 (0.61,10.28) | 3.37 (−1.85,8.60) |
0.88 | 0.89 | 0.03 | 0.21 | |
PHIV EFV− vs. HEU3 | 4.40 (1.75,11.04) | 3.67 (1.44,9.36) | 7.27 (4.11,10.44) | 5.54 (2.47,8.61) |
0.002 | 0.006 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
Model 6A | Model 6B | Model 12A | Model 12B | |
PHIV TDF+ vs. PHEU3 | 6.79 (2.54,18.12) | 5.50 (1.95,15.49) | 14.22 (9.11,19.32) | 11.65 (6.47,16.83) |
<0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
PHIV TDF− vs. PHEU3 | 2.92 (1.13,7.6) | 2.64 (1.01,6.94) | 4.80 (1.69,7.91) | 3.71 (0.61,6.82) |
0.03 | 0.05 | 0.002 | 0.02 |
Abbreviations: PHIV-Perinatally HIV-infected; PHEU-perinatally HIV-exposed uninfected; TDF-tenofovir; EFV-efavirenz, 25(OH)D – 25 hydroxy-vitamin D.
For the outcome 25(OH)D, the models were adjusted for age, black race, ancestry markers, latitude as a continuous variable, and season. For the outcome PTH, models were adjusted for age, black race, and ancestry markers.
Model 1B, 2B, and 3B were fit using the Poisson link and the robust standard error.
In sensitivity analyses including children with ARV data just prior to the 25(OH)D date, and not on the 25(OH)D date, the results did not change for the TDF or EFV analyses.