Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Res Pers. 2016 Aug 3;67:144–150. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.07.011

Table 5.

Results from linear regression models with inhibitory control, impulsivity, novelty seeking, and demographic variables as predictors of overt or relational aggression (no interaction terms).

Model 1 (outcome: relational aggression) Model 2 (outcome: overt aggression) Model 3 (outcome: relational aggression) Model 4 (outcome: overt aggression)
Mother CBQ inhibitory control −0.016 (0.033) 0.020 (0.034) −0.093* (0.028) −0.080* (0.029)
Self report EATQ impulsivity 0.38* (0.046) 0.42* (0.050)
Self report EATQ NS 0.044 (0.042) 0.063 (0.039)
Mother EATQ impulsivity 0.30* (0.056) 0.40* (0.058)
Mother EATQ NS 0.006 (0.042) 0.034 (0.039)
Sex 0.094 (0.061) 0.32 (0.063)* 0.059 (0.063) 0.32* (0.062)
Age 0.005* (0.0025) 0.001 (0.0026) 0.004 (0.0025) −0.001 (0.0026)
Pubertal status 0.025 (0.040) 0.085* (0.038) −0.005 (0.041) 0.060 (0.037)
SES composite −0.035 (0.039) −0.098* (0.040) −0.036 (0.036) −0.11* (0.038)

Note: CBQ = Children's Behavior Questionnaire; EATQ = Early Adolescent Questionnaire; sex was coded as 1 for females and 2 for males; pubertal status is based on a composite of mother and self-report of physical development (breast development, body hair growth, etc.); SES composite is a combination of standardized values for family income and mother's number of years of education; values in the cells are unstandardized partial regression coefficients, with standard errors in parentheses.

*

p < 0.05.