Table 5.
Model 1 (outcome: relational aggression) | Model 2 (outcome: overt aggression) | Model 3 (outcome: relational aggression) | Model 4 (outcome: overt aggression) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mother CBQ inhibitory control | −0.016 (0.033) | 0.020 (0.034) | −0.093* (0.028) | −0.080* (0.029) |
Self report EATQ impulsivity | – | – | 0.38* (0.046) | 0.42* (0.050) |
Self report EATQ NS | – | – | 0.044 (0.042) | 0.063 (0.039) |
Mother EATQ impulsivity | 0.30* (0.056) | 0.40* (0.058) | – | – |
Mother EATQ NS | 0.006 (0.042) | 0.034 (0.039) | – | – |
Sex | 0.094 (0.061) | 0.32 (0.063)* | 0.059 (0.063) | 0.32* (0.062) |
Age | 0.005* (0.0025) | 0.001 (0.0026) | 0.004 (0.0025) | −0.001 (0.0026) |
Pubertal status | 0.025 (0.040) | 0.085* (0.038) | −0.005 (0.041) | 0.060 (0.037) |
SES composite | −0.035 (0.039) | −0.098* (0.040) | −0.036 (0.036) | −0.11* (0.038) |
Note: CBQ = Children's Behavior Questionnaire; EATQ = Early Adolescent Questionnaire; sex was coded as 1 for females and 2 for males; pubertal status is based on a composite of mother and self-report of physical development (breast development, body hair growth, etc.); SES composite is a combination of standardized values for family income and mother's number of years of education; values in the cells are unstandardized partial regression coefficients, with standard errors in parentheses.
p < 0.05.