Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 27;11:1177932217733422. doi: 10.1177/1177932217733422

Table 4.

Relative frequency (%) of enzymatic functions in GC-poor and GC-rich bacterial species found in triatomine digestive tract according to the first EC number digit.

ECNO.
Ss
Hs
Ef
So
Average SD Sm
Mm
Gp
Ct
Ro
Average SD AvGCr/AvGCpa Class of enzyme function
GC3,% 22.9 28.3 29.8 37.7 72.5 78.0 81.3 83.3 83.5
1. -.-.- 17.9 14.4 12.7 12.8 14.4 2.4 21.2 31.6 30.5 20.3 34.2 27.5 6.4 1.9 Oxidoreductases
2. -.-.- 31.9 33.8 31.6 33.7 32.8 1.2 29.5 28.8 27.6 32.4 25.3 28.7 2.6 0.9 Transferases
3. -.-.- 29.3 27.2 35.5 33.9 31.5 3.9 28.3 21.2 19.6 25.3 19.8 22.8 3.8 0.7 Hydrolases
4. -.-.- 8.2 10.0 6.9 7.2 8.1 1.4 10.1 8.5 9.6 9.3 8.9 9.3 0.6 1.1 Lyases
5. -.-.- 5.3 7.5 6.7 5.1 6.1 1.1 6.2 3.3 4.5 4.3 4.3 4.5 1.0 0.7 Isomerases
6. -.-.- 7.5 7.1 6.6 7.3 7.1 0.4 4.7 6.6 8.3 8.4 7.6 7.1 1.5 1.0 Ligases

Abbreviations: Ct, Corynebacterium terpenotabidum; EC no., Enzyme Commission number; Ef, Enterococcus faecalis; Gp, Gordonia polyisoprenivorans; Hs, Haemophilus somnus; Mm, Mycobacterium marinum; Ro, Rhodococcus opacus; Sm, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; So, Streptococcus oralis; Ss, Staphylococcus saprophyticus.

a

Factor difference where AvGCr is for average of GC-rich and AvGCp is for average of GC-poor.

The shading regions in Table 4 is to improve the contrast between GC-rich (gray) and GC-poor (white) genomes.