Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 27.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2017 Sep 27;549(7673):511–515. doi: 10.1038/nature23899

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison between modelled compositions of a vapour depleted liquid and observed terrestrial compositions. a) Changes in isotope compositions (‰/amu) against total relative vapour loss (FTotal, in mole fractions) calculated in our model. b) Observed terrestrial Mg (this study), and Si (from [4] and references therein) isotope compositions relative to enstatite chondrites (EH). Errors are 2se. c) Loss (mole fraction) of a given element (X), fX, versus FTotal. d) Molar element/Ca of the terrestrial mantle7, normalised to EH31. Shaded bands give error bounds for FTotal inferred from Mg isotope data and the intersection of different curves with this field indicates the range of terrestrial depletions predicted for our vapour loss model. Comparison of these values to those calculated for the Earth relative to an enstatite chondrite starting composition (b and d) is generally good, despite uncertainties in model input parameters (see Methods) and additional influences on observed values from nebular and core formation processes4,9. Left pointing arrows show the effect of post-volatile loss accretion of 20% chondrite (EH).