Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 2.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Behav Dev. 2015 Apr 22;40(4):334–345. doi: 10.1177/0165025415581914

Table 2.

Multilevel regression estimates predicting daily cortisol activity from loneliness and coping efficacy.

Model 2
Model 3
Loneliness
Loneliness × Coping
Coefficient SEI CI Coefficient SEI CI
Intercept: waking level, γ000 −1.593*** .073 −1.739 – −1.447 −1.595*** .071 1.737 – 1.453
 White, γ001 .132 .153 −.173 – .437 .200 .138 −.075 – .475
 Oral contraceptive use, γ002 −.072 .138 −.347 – .203 −.167 .122 − .410 – .076
 Caffeine, γ003 .049 .130 −.210 – .308 .013 .121 −.228 – .254
 Cortisol area under the curve T1, γ004 .012 .007 .002 – .026 .013 .007 −.001 – .027
 Loneliness T1, γ005 −.003 .010 −.023 – .017 −.011 .009 −.029 – .007
 Loneliness T2, γ006 .005 .009 −.013 – .025 .003 .008 −.013 – .019
 Coping efficacy T1, γ007 −.064** .022 −.108 – .020
 Coping efficacy T2, γ008 .015 .017 −.019 – .049
 Loneliness T2 Coping efficacy T1, γ009 .003* .001 .001 – .005
Cortisol awakening response, γ100 .550*** .056 .438 – .662 .552*** .056 .440 – .664
 White, γ101 −.143 .123 −.388 – .102 −.174 .128 −.429 – .081
 Oral contraceptive use, γ102 −.184 .108 −.400 – .032 −.119 .109 −.337 – .099
 Caffeine, γ103 −.075 .115 −.304 – .154 −.037 .112 −.260 – .186
 Loneliness T1, γ104 −.005 .007 −.019 – .009 −.002 .007 −.016 – .012
 Loneliness T2, γ105 .002 .007 −.012 – .017 .001 .009 −.017 – .019
 Coping efficacy T1, γ106 .035 .019 −.003 – .073
 Coping efficacy T2, γ107 −.016 .018 −.052 – .020
 Loneliness T2 Coping efficacy T1, γ108 −.002 .002 −.006 – .002
Time since waking: linear slope, γ200 −.079*** .016 −.11 – −.047 −.079*** .016 −.111 –.047
 White, γ201 −.021 .014 −.049 – .007 −.029* .012 −.053 –.005
 Oral contraceptive use, γ202 .018 .015 −.012 – .048 .029 .015 −.001 – .059
 Caffeine, γ203 .014 .013 −.012– .040 .019 .013 −.007 – .045
 Loneliness T1, γ204 .002* .001 .001 – .004 .003** .001 .001 – .005
 Loneliness T2, γ205 −.002* .001 −.004 – −.001 −.002* .001 −.004 – .001
 Coping efficacy T1, γ206 .005 .003 −.001 – .011
 Coping efficacy T2, γ207 −.002 .002 −.006 – .002
 Loneliness T2 Coping efficacy T1, γ208 −.004** .0001 −.0042 – .0038
 Time since waking2: quadratic slope, γ300 −.002* .001 −.004 – −.001 −.002* .001 −.004–.001
 Momentary negative affect (NA), γ400 .066** .024 .018 – .114 .045* .023 −.001 –.068
 Momentary stress level, γ500 −.008 .021 −.050 – .034 −.010 .023 −.056 – .036

Note. 958 moments nested within 70 individuals. Intercept (waking cortisol level) reflects log μg/dL. SE = robust standard errors. CI = 95% confidence interval for individual regression estimates.

p < .10,

*

p .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.