Table 2.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | 26 | 24 | 21 | 16 | 14 | 12 | 10 | 8 |
Density | .07 | .15 | .10 | .25 | .17 | .09 | .27 | .25 |
Mean degree within | 1.75 | 3.45 | 2.00 | 3.75 | 2.21 | .99 | 2.43 | 1.75 |
Race | ||||||||
White | .23 | .75 | .05 | .13 | .57 | .42 | .00 | .25 |
Black | .69 | .25 | .71 | .75 | .43 | .42 | .00 | .75 |
Hispanic | .08 | .00 | .19 | .13 | .00 | .17 | 1.00 | .00 |
Religion | ||||||||
Muslim | .15 | .00 | .48 | .50 | .14 | .17 | .00 | .63 |
Catholic | .15 | .33 | .14 | .19 | .07 | .08 | .50 | .13 |
Protestant | .12 | .25 | .05 | .13 | .36 | .17 | .10 | .13 |
Other | .27 | .29 | .24 | .19 | .21 | .50 | .30 | .00 |
None | .31 | .13 | .10 | .00 | .21 | .08 | .10 | .13 |
Gang or STG | .15 | .04 | .10 | .13 | .14 | .08 | .00 | .00 |
Misconduct (past 1.5yr) | .27 | .17 | .43 | .19 | .14 | .42 | .10 | .88 |
Age | 36.69 | 48.33 | 31.24 | 41.13 | 41.93 | 38.17 | 37.70 | 31.00 |
Highest Grade | 11.35 | 11.25 | 11.14 | 11.25 | 11.79 | 11.00 | 10.40 | 11.00 |
Offense Severity | 8.96 | 11.63 | 11.05 | 11.75 | 8.79 | 7.67 | 10.00 | 9.38 |
Years in Prison | 3.55 | 12.94 | 3.42 | 10.78 | 5.21 | 4.60 | 4.12 | 3.55 |
Years on Unit | .65 | 4.13 | .79 | 2.43 | .53 | .46 | 1.02 | .83 |
Power Indegree | .85 | 1.63 | .19 | 3.19 | .21 | .50 | .40 | .00 |
Num. of CPM Brokers | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Notes.
Two isolates were removed prior to running the community detection analyses Newman modularity: .43
Community 3: % does not equal 100% for race because one inmate reported being Asian (the only one in the sample).
Bold indicates characteristics of communities that notably exceeded the unit average.