Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 6;54(5):1773–1793. doi: 10.1007/s13524-017-0612-0

Table 4.

Effects on firm’s payment rank in percentage of mean employment

IV
1–10 11–20 21–30 31–40
All
 Employed –0.11** –0.03* 0.04 0.04
 Employed by firm above 25th percentile –0.21** –0.05* 0.00 0.00
 Employed by firm above median –0.18** –0.09* 0.01 –0.01
 Employed by firm above 75th percentile –0.26 –0.12 –0.08 –0.13
No College
 Employed –0.12** –0.03* 0.04* 0.04
 Employed by firm above 25th percentile –0.25** –0.06* 0.01 0.09
 Employed by firm above median –0.21* –0.07 0.04 0.08
 Employed by firm above 75th percentile –0.23 –0.05 –0.01 –0.02
College
 Employed –0.07 –0.02 –0.04 –0.24*
 Employed by firm above 25th percentile –0.12* –0.04 –0.05 –0.26*
 Employed by firm above median –0.13 –0.13** –0.07 –0.33*
 Employed by firm above 75th percentile –0.27 –0.26* –0.34* –0.64*

Note: Each cell displays the ratio from taking the estimate from the 2SLS estimations displayed in Table 3 and dividing it by the average employment in that segment (displayed in Table S1 in Online Resource 1).

p < .10; *p < .05; **p < .01