Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 28;4:54. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00054

Table 3.

Deep brain stimulation with diffusion tensor imaging for obsessive–compulsive disorder.

First author (ref) Response Scale Mean preop, scores (range) Mean postop, scores (range) Mean improvement (%) Target Tract
Prospective direct tract targeting

Coenen (33) 2 responders Y-BOCS 34.5 ± 6.4 (30–39) 20.5 ± 7.8 (15–26) 41.7 ± 11.79 VC/VS slMFB

Retrospective tract proximity analysis

Makris (34) 1 responder Y-BOCS Not reported Not reported 35 VC/VS lOFC-thal
mOFC-thal

Retrospective tract stimulation modeling

Hartmann (35) 4 responders
2 non-responders
Y-BOCS Not reported Not reported 53.8 ± 27.9
15.8 ± 17.5
ALIC NAcc

Prospective cohort: Retrospective cohort:
Overall responder proportion = 2 out of 2 (100%) Overall responder proportion = 5 out of 7 (71%)
Overall mean improvement in responders = 41.7 ± 11.8% Overall mean improvement in responders = 44.4 ± 27.9%
Overall mean improvement among non-responders = n.a. Overall mean improvement among non-responders = 15.8 ± 17.5%

Scale. Y-BOCS, Yale-Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (55).

Targets. VC/VS, ventral anterior internal capsule and ventral striatum; ALIC, anterior limb of internal capsule; NAcc, nucleus accumbens.

Tract. l/mOFC-thal, lateral/medial orbitofrontocortical-thalamic.