Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 18;19(9):e314. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8148

Table 2.

Delay of initiation of sexual intercourse by study condition.a

Behavior Control PlayForward Total, n (%) Pc

n (%) 95% CIb n (%) 95% CIb

Baseline






Delay of initiation of sexual intercourse 165 (100)
162 (100)
327 (100)a
6 Weeks




>.99

Delay of initiation of sexual intercourse 132 (97.8) 93.6-99.5 132 (98.5) 94.7-99.8 264 (98.1)

Initiation of sexual intercourse 3 (1.8)
2 (1.2)
5 (1.5)
3 Months




.72

Delay of initiation of sexual intercourse 133 (97.8) 93.7-99.54 127 (97.0) 92.4-99.2 260 (97.4)

Initiation of sexual intercourse 3 (1.8)
4 (2.5)
7 (2.1)
6 Months




.72

Delay of initiation of sexual intercourse 126 (97.7) 93.4-99.5 120 (96.8) 92.0-99.1 246 (97.2)

Initiation of sexual intercourse 3 (1.8)
4 (2.5)
7 (2.1)
12 Months




>.99

Delay of initiation of sexual intercourse 123 (95.4) 90.2-98.3 122 (94.6) 89.1-97.8 245 (95.0)

Initiation of sexual intercourse 6 (3.6)
7 (4.3)
13 (4.0)

aA total of six participants (control: n=2; PlayForward: n=4), who at baseline were identified (per primary outcome definition) as being engaged in sexual intercourse, were removed from the primary analysis because they had already reached the primary outcome.

bExact 95% confidence intervals are provided for the main outcome (delay of initiation of sexual intercourse).

cP values are based on a two-sided Fisher exact chi-square test.