Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Community Psychol. 2017 Jul 7;60(1-2):215–228. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12147

Table 1.

Evaluation data from Community Dialogues (N=173)

Round 1
(N=87)
M(SD)
Round 2
(N=40)
M(SD)
Round 3
(N=46)
M(SD)
Total
(N=173)
M(SD)
I understood the objectives of today’s meeting. 3.62(.58) 3.62(.54) 3.65(.48) 3.63(.54)
The facilitators always provided clear instructions. 3.54(.64) 3.73(.45) 3.61(.49) 3.60(.57)
The facilitators were responsive to the audience questions. 3.71(.55) 3.77(.48) 3.64(.47) 3.72(.51)
The facilitators seemed knowledgeable. 3.64(.57) 3.83(.45) 3.67(.47) 3.69(.52)
The activities were useful for my learning. 3.64(.57) 3.62(.54) 3.59(.50) 3.62(.55)
I felt that my voice was heard. 3.70(.59) 3.70(.46) 3.61(.54) 3.68(.55)
I felt comfortable participating. 3.66(.54) 3.75(.44) 3.61(.58) 3.67(.53)
The time of the meeting was convenient for me. 3.59(.62) 3.52(.60) 3.46(.66) 3.54(.62)
The location of the meeting was convenient for me. 3.48(.73) 3.65(.62) 3.54(.59) 3.54(.67)
This event was useful for increasing my knowledge around important issues. 3.62(.65) 3.52(.64) 3.57(.58) 3.58(.63)
This event will benefit the communities that I care about. 3.74(.54) 3.77(.43) 3.70(.47) 3.73(.49)

Notes. Items are rated on a 4-point scale (1=Strongly Disagree; 4=Strongly Agree).