Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 1;8:78. doi: 10.1186/s40104-017-0209-x

Table 4.

Cow BW and BCS, calf BW, cow progesterone concentrations and reproductive performance

Itema Treatmentb SEM P-valuec
30-d 60-d 90-d Control S L Q
Supplement fed, kg/d 3.00 1.50 1.00
Cow BW, kg, cow BCS and calf BW, kg
 Initial BW 494 517 503 503 18.0 0.95 0.74 0.43
 Initial BCS 4.66 4.65 4.54 4.87 0.20 0.28 0.65 0.85
 Calving BW 508 515 531 522 6.79 0.56 0.02 0.55
 Calving BCS 4.74 4.83 4.83 4.82 0.15 0.95 0.70 0.82
 Calf birth BW 33.8 31.7 35.8 36.2 1.93 0.28 0.43 0.10
 Cow BW 31 d after calving 468 490 482 465 7.73 0.09 0.21 0.15
 BW change from parturition to day 31 post-calving −46.7 −24.9 −53.5 −62.1 8.24 0.04 0.58 0.03
 Breeding season BCS 5.00 5.11 4.83 5.03 0.21 0.84 0.57 0.43
Progesterone concentration, ng/dL
 21 d after calving 0.27* 0.21 0.12 0.14 0.06 0.34 0.05 0.82
 31 d after calving 1.24 0.70 0.69 0.14 0.37 0.08 0.29 0.55
Cow reproductive performance, %
 Calving to conception, d 57.2 63.1 84.2* 64.1 5.85 0.53 0.01 0.30

aBW– body weight; BCS – body condition score; FTAI – fixed time artificial insemination

bTreatments: 30-d – cows received 3.0 kg of concentrate supplement beginning 30 d prior to calving; 60-d – cows received 1.5 kg of concentrate supplement beginning 60 d prior to calving; 90-d – cows received 1.0 kg of concentrate supplement beginning 90 d prior to calving; and control – no concentrate supplement was fed

cS – effect of supplementation, supplemented treatments compared to the control; L and Q – effects of linear and quadratic order of supplement delivery strategy (30, 60 or 90 d). * Means statistically different from the control by Dunnett’s test