Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 3.
Published in final edited form as: Transl Cancer Res. 2016 Oct;5(Suppl 4):S632–S635. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2016.10.29

Table 1.

Comparison of various “liquid biopsy” tests in non-small cell lung cancer

Type of “liquid biopsy” Source Methods of isolation FDA-approved assays Sensitivity of available assays Specificity of available assays
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) Shed from primary tumors Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM)-independent or EpCAM-dependent assays None yet approved 23–90% (detection rates) N/A
Cell-free nucleic acid (cfNA) Passive release from apoptosis/necrosis or active secretion; from both tumor and healthy cells Many extraction kits with further enrichment using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) or next generation sequencing (NGS) cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 (assesses for EGFR sensitizing mutations) 15–100% 89–100%
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) Membranous lipid structures secreted by both tumor and healthy cells Differential ultra-centrifugation (gold standard); assays not needing special equipment to isolate EVs based on their physical properties are also available None yet approved N/A (technology still being developed) N/A (technology still being developed)
Urine cfNA cfNA that is either filtered by the kidney or from cells that came into direct contact with urine Extraction kits with further enrichment through ddPCR or NGS as in plasma cfNA None yet approved 81–100% (Concordance rates) N/A

Myriad Genetics

Roche