Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Jul 14;26(10):1525–1530. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0338

Table 2.

Tobacco product use behaviors by tobacco product use pattern category among tobacco users, NHANES 1999–2012.

CIG NCC NC NCC&NC CIG&NC CIG&NCC POLY
mean 95% CI mean 95% CI mean 95% CI mean 95% CI mean 95% CI mean 95% CI mean 95% CI
# of days a product used in past 5 days
Cigarette 4.4 4.4–4.4 3.9* 3.6–4.3 4.3 4.0–5.6 3.7 2.7–4.6
Pipe 3.5 3.0–3.9 3.1 1.4–4.8 2.0 1.6–2.4 2.3 1.5–3.0
Cigar 2.7 2.5–2.8 3.0 2.6–3.4 2.5 2.2–2.7 2.2 1.6–2.8
Chew 4.2 4.0–4.4 3.0** 2.1–3.8 3.3** 2.8–3.8 2.3** 1.0–3.6
Snuff 4.3 4.0–4.5 2.5** 0 5.2 3.2** 2.3–4.1 2.1** 0.2–3.9

# of times product used on the day a product was use in past 5 days
Cigarette 13.9 13.5–14.5 10.6* 7.9–13.0 15.5 9.8–21.3 11.2 5.3–17.0
Pipe 5.2 2.6–7.8 4.4 1.6–7.3 1.6 1.1–2.1 1.8 1.5–2.2
Cigar 2.6 2.3–2.8 6.2* 3.3–9.1 2.3 2.1–2.5 1.9** 1.6–2.2

Note: CIG=cigarettes only; NCC=non-cigarette combustibles only; NC=non-combustibles only; NCC&NC=dual non-cigarette combustibles and non-combustible; CIG&NC=dual cigarettes and non-combustibles; CIG&NCC=dual cigarettes and non-cigarette combustibles; POLY=poly-tobacco. Unadjusted means and confidence intervals (CI) are presented. Estimates are adjusted for age, gender, race/ethnicity, and education. Tobacco product use in dual and poly-tobacco use T-PUPs were compared to corresponding single product category T-PUPs (e.g., CIG&NC, CIG&NCC, and POLY were compared to CIG).

*

p < 0.05.

**

p < 0.01.