Table 3.

The regression coefficient of profile personality similarity effect on relationship quality.

	Average discrepancy								ICC
	M1				M2				M1				M2
	β	SE	p	95%CI	β	SE	p	95%CI	β	SE	p	95%CI	β	SE	p	95%CI
Gender	−0.24	0.06	0.00	−0.35, −0.13	−0.26	0.06	0.00	−0.38, −0.15	−0.25	0.06	0.00	−0.36, −0.13	−0.26	0.06	0.00	−0.38, −0.15
Duration	0.07	0.03	0.03	0.01, 0.14	0.09	0.04	0.01	0.01, 0.16	0.07	0.03	0.03	0.01, 0.14	0.08	0.04	0.02	0.01, 0.15
Gender × Duration	−0.02	0.03	0.47	−0.09, 0.05	−0.03	0.04	0.34	−0.11, 0.04	−0.02	0.03	0.52	−0.09, 0.04	−0.03	0.04	0.40	−0.10, 0.04
Profile similarity	0.50	0.20	0.01	0.10, 0.90	0.51	0.20	0.01	0.12, 0.89	−0.31	0.11	0.00	−0.51, −0.10	−0.28	0.11	0.01	−0.49, −0.08
Profile similarity × Gender	−0.20	0.19	0.30	−0.61, 0.18	−0.34	0.20	0.09	−0.78, 0.07	0.22	0.11	0.04	0.02, 0.42	0.28	0.11	0.01	0.06, 0.48
Profile similarity × Duration	0.26	0.13	0.04	0.04, 0.51	0.35	0.13	0.01	0.07, 0.59	−0.14	0.06	0.03	−0.26, −0.02	−0.16	0.06	0.01	−0.29, −0.03
Profile similarity × Gender × Duration	−0.21	0.13	0.09	−0.44, 0.03	−0.18	0.14	0.17	−0.47, 0.08	0.10	0.06	0.11	−0.02, 0.23	0.12	0.07	0.06	−0.01, 0.25
R2	0.05				0.20				0.05				0.20

M1, only includes the variables shown in the table.

M2, includes the actor, partner effects of five personality traits, and their two-step, three-step interactions with gender and duration. But those variables are not shown in the table.