Table 1.
Evaluation of the goodness-of-fit with the correlation coefficient (r2) and BIC for the representation models that were examined in each group according to the actual forces at the end of the adaptation session
Group |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ND |
D70 |
D100 |
D70_SF |
|||||
Representation Model | r2 | BIC (× 104) | r2 | BIC (× 104) | r2 | BIC (× 104) | r2 | BIC (× 104) |
v (t) | 0.714 | 1.71 | 0.417 | 2.37 | 0.208 | 2.01 | 0.284 | 1.55 |
p (t), v (t) | 0.732 | 1.65 | 0.648 | 1.80 | 0.468 | 1.58 | 0.459 | 1.30 |
v (t − τ) | 0.682 | 1.68 | 0.457 | 1.59 | 0.398 | 1.39 | ||
p (t), v (t − τ) | 0.699 | 1.63 | 0.476 | 1.56 | 0.430 | 1.35 | ||
p (t), v (t), a (t) | 0.727 | 1.53 | 0.507 | 1.51 | 0.468 | 1.30 | ||
p (t), v (t), v (t − τ) | 0.768 | 1.34 | 0.574 | 1.34 | 0.476 | 1.28 |
BIC, Bayesian information criterion. Values of r2 closer to 1 and smaller values of BIC indicate a better model (values in bold).