Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 19;19(9):e313. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7896

Table 3.

Risk of bias.a

Author Selection bias Performance bias Detection bias Attrition bias

Random sequence generation Allocation concealment Single blind Blinding of outcome assessor Missing data
Beauchamp et al [27] + + + +
Blom et al [28] + + + +
Chih et al [29] + + +
Cristancho-Lacroix et al [30] + +
DuBenske et al [31] + + +
Eames et al [32] + + + +
Kim et al [33] + + ? +
McLaughlin et al [34] + + + +
Namkoong et al [35] + + +
Pierce et al [36] + + ?
Smith et al [37] + + +
Torkamani et al [38] + + ? ?

a+: low risk of bias; – high risk of bias; ?: unclear risk of bias.