Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 17;8(9):6594–6600. doi: 10.1039/c7sc02472j

Table 2. Energy decomposition analyses of [ArB3O4]+, [ArB3O5]+, [ArB4O6]+ and [ArB5O7]+ at the BP86/TZ2P level using the CCSD(T)/cc-pVTZ optimized geometries. The Ar–B bond distances (Å), dissociation energies (D e), natural charges (Q) and Wiberg bond orders (WBI) are also shown. Energy values are given in kcal mol–1 .

Species Ar–B3O4 +(1A1) Ar–B3O5 +(3B2) Ar–B4O6 +(2A′) Ar–B5O7 +(1A1)
r(Ar–B) 2.851 2.004 2.002 2.001
D e 3.4 16.2 16.3 16.4
ΔE int –2.3 –19.7 –19.5 –20.4
ΔE Pauli 6.2 53.1 54.1 51.2
ΔE elstat a –1.6[18.8%] –15.0[20.7%] –16.1[21.9%] –14.3[20.0%]
ΔE orb a –6.9[81.2%] –57.8[79.3%] –57.5[78.1%] –57.3[80.0%]
ΔE orb σ b –5.1(73.9%) –44.7(77.3%) –45.0(78.3%) –45.3(79.1%)
ΔE orb π b –8.6(14.9%) –9.2(16.0%) –9.0(15.7%)
ΔE orb(r) b –1.8(26.1%) –4.5(7.8%) –3.3(5.7%) –3.0(5.2%)
Q(Ar) 0.036 0.355 0.357 0.358
WBI 0.015 0.543 0.545 0.547

aThe values in brackets give the percentage contribution to the total attractive interactions ΔE elstat + ΔE orb.

bThe values in parentheses give the percentage contribution to the total ΔE orb. ΔE orb(r) is the rest interaction energy of ΔE orb.