Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 4;7:12676. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13149-x

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of different prognostic variables for overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) prediction in ccRCC patients.

Characteristic OS RFS
Univariate Multivariate Univariate Multivariate
HR (95% CI) P a HR (95% CI) P a HR (95% CI) P a HR (95% CI) P a
Gender(Male vs Female) 1.037(0.556–1.934) 0.908 1.205(0.615–2.358) 0.587 1.228(0.733–2.059) 0.435 1.343(0.782–2.307) 0.284
Age,years (>55 vs ≤55) 1.250(0.682–2.290) 0.471 0.999(0.496–2.013) 0.998 1.417(0.850–2.361) 0.181 1.274(0.725–2.238) 0.400
Tumor size,cm (>4 vs ≤4) 7.791(3.447–17.607) <0.001* 4.596(1.600–13.198) 0.005* 7.472(3.773–14.797) <0.001* 5.666(2.517–12.755) <0.001*
T classification (T3 + T4 vs T1 + T2) 11.583(5.912–22.693) <0.001* 0.753(0.167–3.394) 0.711 5.185(3.067–8.766) <0.001* 0.337(0.094–1.209) 0.095
N classification (N1 vs N0) 2.099(0.646–6.818) 0.217 1.075(0.289–4.006) 0.914 1.904(0.688–2.267) 0.215 1.328(0.438–4.028) 0.616
TNM stage (III + IV vs I + II) 10.006(5.261–19.028) <0.001* 9.571(2.034–45.026) 0.004* 5.157(3.025–8.793) <0.001* 9.613(2.456–37.623) 0.001*
Fuhrman grade (3 + 4 vs 1 + 2) 1.742(0.916–3.316) 0.091 3.779(1.645–8.680) 0.002* 2.628(1.568–4.405) <0.001* 4.978(2.669–9.282) <0.001*
Necrosis(Present vs Absent) 2.493(1.153–5.392) 0.020* 4.808(1.649–14.017) 0.004* 1.905(0.936–3.876) 0.076 3.734(1.548–9.004) 0.003*
FGL2 expression (High vs low) 6.636(2.579–17.080) <0.001* 3.396(1.187–9.722) 0.023* 4.214(2.119–8.383) <0.001* 2.940(1.402–6.166) 0.004*

HR = hazard ratio; CI = confidence interval. a P-value from the Cox proportional hazards model; *Statistically significant (P < 0.05).