Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 13;473(2205):20170387. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2017.0387

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Variation of tube radius with flow rate for chemical gardens. Thouvenel et al.’s experimental data [30] for Rc=11 mm, Δρi= 115.75 kg m−3, μi=0.942 mPas, μi/μe= 0.942/1.74=0.541, g=9.81 m s−2 are shown with the prediction from Thouvenal et al. (dashed line) and that of Poiseuille flow, equation (1.5) with dP/dz=0 (dot-dashed line), together with equation (1.4) with dP/dz=0 (dotted line) and with dP/dz=−3 Pa m−1 (solid line). (Online version in colour.)