Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 17;9(7):1052–1064. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2017.1364824

Table 2.

Comparison of apparent affinities of membrane-bound gp145 obtained from flow cytometry titration vs. soluble gp140 Env variants obtained from ELISA titration.

  V3 peptides Membrane-bound gp145 Soluble gp140
  KD [nM]
KD [nM] (flow cytometry titration, n = 3)
KD [nM] (ELISA titration, n = 3)
V3 loop substitution 447–52D HGN194 447–52D HGN194 447–52D HGN194
MN 0.6- NA 0.9 ± 0.08 (R2 = 0.990) 0.6 ± 0.04 (R2 = 0.981) 0.4 ± 0.02 (R2 = 995) 0.2 ± 0.05 (R2 = 0.926)
HXB2 24   2 ± 0.2 (R2 = 0.991) 1.3 ± 0.2 (R2 = 0.973) 0.5 ± 0.002 (R2 = 0.983) 7 ± 5 (R2 = 0.537)
CDC42 5   3 ± 0.2 (R2 = 0.996) 1.5 ± 0.09 (R2 = 0.951) 1 ± 0.4 (R2 = 0.983) 0.6 ± 0.2 (R2 = 0.797)
RF 0.9   7 ± 1 (R2 = 0.972) NA 74 ± 7 (R2 = 0.992) NA
SF33 NA   NA NA NA NA

KD values were calculated using nonlinear least squares regression for titration of membrane-bound gp145 Envs and soluble gp140 Envs. Due to low antibody binding, the apparent KD values for RF and SF33 could not be calculated in some cases (NA). Values for V3 peptides were adopted from ref.30