Table 4.
Manual CAC scoring in CSCT vs (a) manual and (b) automatic CAC scoring in CTAC at stress
| Very low | Low | Intermediate | High | Very high | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very low 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Low 1–10 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Intermediate 11–100 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 0 |
| High 101–400 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 8 |
| Very high >400 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 54 |
| Very low | Low | Intermediate | High | Very high | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very low 0 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Low 1–10 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Intermediate 11–100 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 0 |
| High 101–400 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 10 |
| Very high >400 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 52 |
Cardiovascular risk categories based on the Agatston score (0, 1-10, 11-100, 101-400, >400) assigned to a patient by the manual scoring in CSCT (rows) and (a) manual and (b) automatic scoring in CTAC scans acquired at stress (columns) taking different ranges of Agatston scores between CSCT and CTAC scan into account