Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 5;21(5):357–364. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.06.005

Table 1.

Baseline demographic data and clinical characteristics of 117 patients with an initial indication for NIPPV support.

Group A (n = 96) Group B (n = 13) Group C (n = 8)
Male 49 (51) 7 (54) 5 (50)
Age, yrs 68 (37–85) 61 (56–78) 67 (54–80)



Lung function
 FEV1, L 0.81 (0.39–2.34) 0.65 (0.54–2.20) 1.04 (0.77–1.58)*,†
 FEV1, %pred 35 ± 13 34 ± 15 43 ± 4
 FVC, L 1.85 (0.93–3.59) 1.45 (1.41–3.54) 1.78 (1.03–2.52)
 FVC, %pred 59 (26–86) 53 (39–79) 61 (21–68)
 FEV1/FVC 0.46 ± 0.10 0.45 ± 0.86 0.64 ± 0.05*,†



GOLD classification
 Moderate (II) 19 (20) 1 (8) 1 (13)
 Severe (III) 51 (53) 5 (38) 5 (62)
 Very severe (IV) 26 (27) 7 (54) 2 (25)



Comorbid conditions
 Hypertension 57 (59) 8 (62) 6 (75)
 Ex-smoker 56 (58) 7 (54) 5 (62)
 Active smoking 16 (17) 4 (31) 2 (25)
 Diabetes mellitus 23 (24) 6 (46) 3 (38)
 Heart failure 19 (20) 2 (15) 3 (38)



Manchester risk classificationa
 Immediate 17 (18) – 2 (25)
 Very urgent 66 (69) 13 (100) 5 (62)
 Urgent 5 (5) – 1 (13)



Home NIPPV use 5 (5) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Home oxygen therapy 42 (44) 3 (23) 1 (13)

Values are presented as mean ± SD or median (minimum–maximum), and absolute number (frequency %). Definition of abbreviations: NIPPV, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; %pred, percent of predicted; FVC, forced vital capacity.

*

p < 0.05 between Group A and Group C.

†

p < 0.05 between Group B and Group C.

a

n = 88.