Table 5.
Block I | Block II | Block III | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Items | Predictors | OR | p-value | R2 | OR | p-value | R2 | OR | p-value | R2 | Model comparisonsa |
1 | HADS-A | 2.17 | < 0.001 | 0.412 | 2.17 | < 0.001 | 0.414 | 2.53 | < 0.001 | 0.415 | A |
Sex (male) | 1.30 | < 0.001 | 0.94 | < 0.001 | B | ||||||
Sex x HADS-A | 0.91 | < 0.001 | C | ||||||||
3 | HADS-A | 2.01 | < 0.001 | 0. 418 | 1.99 | < 0.001 | 0.425 | 2.22 | < 0.001 | 0. 425 | A |
Sex (male) | 0.56 | < 0.001 | 0.41 | < 0.001 | B | ||||||
Sex x HADS-A | 0.94 | < 0.001 | C | ||||||||
5 | HADS-A | 2.25 | < 0.001 | 0.438 | 2.24 | < 0.001 | 0.443 | 2.46 | < 0.001 | 0.444 | A |
Sex (male) | 0.60 | < 0.001 | 0.46 | < 0.001 | B | ||||||
Sex x HADS-A | 0.94 | < 0.001 | C | ||||||||
7 | HADS-A | 1.90 | < 0.001 | .333 | 1.92 | < 0.001 | 0.335 | 2.12 | < 0.001 | 0.336 | A |
Sex (male) | 1.35 | < 0.001 | 1.11 | < 0.001 | B | ||||||
Sex x HADS-A | 0.94 | < 0.001 | C | ||||||||
9 | HADS-A | 2.14 | < 0.001 | .432 | 2.13 | < 0.001 | 0.442 | 2.24 | < 0.001 | 0.442 | A |
Sex (male) | 0.51 | < 0.001 | 0.45 | < 0.001 | B | ||||||
Sex x HADS-A | 0.97 | < 0.001 | C | ||||||||
11 | HADS-A | 1.90 | < 0.001 | 0.334 | 1.96 | < 0.001 | 0.342 | 2.16 | < 0.001 | 0.343 | A |
Sex (male) | 1.84 | < 0.001 | 1.47 | < 0.001 | B | ||||||
Sex x HADS-A | 0.94 | < 0.001 | C | ||||||||
13 | HADS-A | 2.00 | < 0.001 | 0.435 | 2.00 | < 0.001 | 0.435 | 2.29 | < 0.001 | 0.436 | A |
Sex (male) | 1.05 | < 0.001 | 0.67 | < 0.001 | B | ||||||
Sex x HADS-A | 0.92 | < 0.001 | C |
aModel comparison is based on the χ2 difference test between the models, with Bonferroni corrected p-values (p < 0.017). Significant differences are reported as: A = Block I & II, B = Block I & III, C = Block II & III