Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 5.
Published in final edited form as: Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Aug 8;28(12):2009–2018. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216000995

Table 2. Cox proportional hazard models for conversion to MCI or dementia.

hazard ratio (SE) p

model 1 model 2 model 3§
Age 1.06 (0.003) < 0.01 1.05 (0.003) < 0.01 1.04 (0.003) < 0.01
Male 1.29 (0.07) < 0.01 1.17 (0.07) 0.004 1.01 (0.07) 0.92
Education 0.96 (0.01) < 0.01 1.02 (0.01) 0.107 1.03 (0.01) < 0.01
Level of independence 2 2.13 (0.32) < 0.01 1.83 (0.28) < 0.01 1.62 (0.25) < 0.002
3 1.89 (0.48) 0.01 2.07 (0.53) < 0.01 1.78 (0.46) 0.02
4 2.10 (1.25) 0.21 2.40 (1.43) 0.14 1.65 (0.99) 0.40
FAQ total 1.02 (0.003) < 0.01 1.01 (0.003) < 0.01 1.01 (0.004) 0.01
GDS 1.11 (0.003) < 0.01 1.10 (0.004) < 0.01 1.10 (0.13) < 0.01
MMSE 0.94 (0.02) 0.001 0.97 (0.02) 0.17
Logical memory 0.93 (0.01) < 0.01 0.94 (0.01) < 0.01
Boston 0.97 (0.01) < 0.01 1.09 (0.01) 0.44
Category fluency (animals) 0.98 (0.01) 0.01
Category fluency (vegetables) 0.95 (0.01) < 0.01
Trails B–A 1.00 (0.001) 0.115
Digit span forward 1.02 (0.02) 0.286
Digit span backward 0.99 (0.02) 0.709
WAIS 0.98 (0.003) < 0.01

Model 1: adjusted for baseline age, sex, years of education, and total FAQ.

Model 2: model 1 + MMSE, logical memory, Boston naming.

§

Model 3: model 1 + model 2 + TMT B–A, animal and vegetable category fluencies, and digit span forward and backward.