. 2017 Jun 30;8(9):6327–6337. doi: 10.1039/c7sc01459g

Table 2. Comparison of energy (eV f.u.^–1), pore size (Å), and volume (Å³ f.u.^–1) of two TiO₂ phases between the DFT and global NN PES calculations, as shown in Fig. 6 .

Table 2. Comparison of energy (eV f.u.–1), pore size (Å), and volume (Å3 f.u.–1) of two TiO2 phases between the DFT and global NN PES calculations, as shown in Fig. 6 .