Table 3. Effects of Cd on the photosynthetic pigments in the leaves of two Italian ryegrass cultivars.
| Cultivar | Cd supply μM | Chl a mg·g−1 FW | Chl b mg·g−1 FW | Car mg·g−1 FW | Chl (a + b) mg·g−1 FW | Chl a/b mg·g−1 FW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IdyII | 0 | 1.10 ± 0.07 abc | 0.34 ± 0.01 ab | 0.18 ± 0.01 abc | 1.44 ± 0.05 ab | 3.25 ± 0.02 ab |
| 5 | 1.03 ± 0.09 bcd | 0.32 ± 0.02 abc | 0.16 ± 0.02 abcd | 1.36 ± 0.07 bc | 3.21 ± 0.05 abc | |
| 10 | 0.97 ± 0.22 cd | 0.31 ± 0.04 bc | 0.16 ± 0.02 bcde | 1.28 ± 0.16 bc | 3.08 ± 0.08 abcd | |
| 25 | 0.97 ± 0.05 cd | 0.32 ± 0.02 abc | 0.14 ± 0.03 cde | 1.33 ± 0.04 bc | 3.05 ± 0.22 abcd | |
| 50 | 0.86 ± 0.01 d | 0.27 ± 0.01 c | 0.13 ± 0.01 cde | 1.13 ± 0.02 c | 3.13 ± 0.12 abc | |
| 100 | 0.58 ± 0.03 ef | 0.20 ± 0.01 d | 0.10 ± 0.01 ef | 0.79 ± 0.01 de | 2.86 ± 0.20 bcd | |
| Harukaze | 0 | 1.20 ± 0.12 ab | 0.38 ± 0.02 a | 0.19 ± 0.01 ab | 1.60 ± 0.10 a | 3.17 ± 0.08 abc |
| 5 | 1.22 ± 0.06 a | 0.38 ± 0.01 a | 0.20 ± 001 a | 1.60 ± 0.05 a | 3.18 ± 0.04 abc | |
| 10 | 0.95 ± 0.12 cd | 0.29 ± 0.02 bc | 0.14 ± 0.01 cde | 1.24 ± 0.09 bc | 3.34 ± 0.04 a | |
| 25 | 0.69 ± 0.06 e | 0.21 ± 0.01 d | 0.12 ± 0.01 def | 0.89 ± 0.04 d | 3.30 ± 0.03 a | |
| 50 | 0.48 ± 0.11 f | 0.17 ± 0.02 d | 0.08 ± 0.01 f | 0.65 ± 0.08 e | 2.83 ± 0.03 cd | |
| 100 | 0.21 ± 0.08 g | 0.07 ± 0.02 e | 0.03 ± 0.01 g | 0.29 ± 0.06 f | 2.71 ± 0.21 d | |
| ANOVA (F Values) | Cd | 51.73*** | 42.84*** | 20.56*** | 51.17*** | 4.43** |
| Cultivar | 15.04* | 19.39*** | 4.92* | 16.73*** | 0.01ns | |
| Cd × cultivar | 9.584*** | 10.24*** | 5.39** | 10.18*** | 1.86ns |
Notes:
Chl a, Chl b, and Car, indicate Chl a, Chl b, and carotenoids, respectively. Values (mean ± SE; n = 3) with different letters in the same columns are significantly different according to the Duncan’s multiple range test.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant.