Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 3;113(1):503–532. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2522-8

Table 8.

List of works on main path (1), main paths (2) and island (3)—part 3

Year Code First author Title Journal
2004 2 Chan, AW Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials... JAMA
2005 23 Bornmann, L Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review... SCIENTOMETRICS
2005 123 Daniel, HD Publications as a measure of scientific advancement and of scientists’ productivity LEARN PUBL
2005 123 Bornmann, L Committee peer review at an international research foundation:... RES EVALUAT
2005 23 Bornmann, L Criteria used by a peer review committee for selection of research fellows... INT J SELECT ASSESS
2005 2 Ioannidis, JPA Why most published research findings are false PLOS MED
2006 123 Bornmann, L Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review—a citation analysis... SCIENTOMETRICS
2006 23 Bornmann, L Potential sources of bias in research fellowship assessments:... RES EVALUAT
2007 123 Bornmann, L Convergent validation of peer review decisions using the h index... J INFORMETR
2007 23 Bornmann, L Gatekeepers of science—effects of external reviewers’ attributes... J INFORMETR
2007 23 Bornmann, L Row-column (RC) association model applied to grant peer review SCIENTOMETRICS
2008 23 Marsh, HW Improving the peer-review process for grant applications... AM PSYCHOL
2008 123 Bornmann, L Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review... J AM SOC INF SCI TEC
2008 23 Bornmann, L The effectiveness of the peer review process: inter-referee agreement... ANGEW CHEM INT EDIT
2008 23 Bornmann, L Latent Markov modeling applied to grant peer review J INFORMETR
2008 23 Bornmann, L Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index?... J AM SOC INF SCI TEC
2009 123 Bornmann, L The luck of the referee draw: the effect of exchanging reviews LEARN PUBL
2009 2 Opthof, T The Hirsch-index: a simple, new tool for the assessment of scientific output... NETH HEART J
2009 2 van der Heyden, MAG Fraud and misconduct in science: the stem cell seduction NETH HEART J
2009 23 Bornmann, L The influence of the applicants’ gender on the modeling of a peer review... SCIENTOMETRICS
2010 23 Bornmann, L The manuscript reviewing process: Empirical research on review... LIBR INFORM SCI RES
2011 123 Bornmann, L Scientific Peer Review ANNU REV INFORM SCI
2011 123 Bornmann, L A multilevel modelling approach to investigating the...of editorial decisions:... J R STAT SOC A STAT
2011 3 Franceschet, M The first Italian research assessment exercise: A bibliometric perspective J INFORMETR
2011 23 Waltman, L On the correlation between bibliometric indicators and peer review:... SCIENTOMETRICS
2012 23 Sen, CK Rebound peer review: a viable recourse for aggrieved authors? ANTIOXID REDOX SIGN
2013 123 Lee, CJ Bias in peer review J AM SOC INF SCI TEC
2014 3 Bornmann, L Do we still need peer review? an argument for change J ASSOC INF SCI TECH
2015 3 Siler, K Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping P NATL ACAD SCI USA
2015 123 Garcia, JA The principal-agent problem in peer review J ASSOC INF SCI TECH
2015 123 Garcia, JA Adverse selection of reviewers J ASSOC INF SCI TECH
2015 123 Moustafa, K Don’t infer anything from unavailable data SCIENTOMETRICS
2015 123 Garcia, JA Bias and effort in peer review J ASSOC INF SCI TECH
2015 123 Garcia, JA The author–editor game SCIENTOMETRICS
2016 123 Rodriguez-Sanchez, R Evolutionary games between authors and their editors APPL MATH COMPUT