Table 2.
Recommendations according to the strategy implemented
| Strategy 1 (n=100) | Strategy 2 (n=100) | Strategy 3 (CPG) (n=80) (%) | Strategy 3 (‘local panel’) (n=100) | |
| Recommendations | ||||
| Strong | 14 | 12 | 21 (26.2) | 21 |
| In favour of the intervention | 55 | 62 | 55 (68.7) | 63 |
| Quality of evidence | ||||
| High | 8 | 5 | – | 12 |
| Moderate | 22 | 25 | – | 28 |
| Low | 34 | 26 | – | 44 |
| Very low | 36 | 44 | – | 16 |
| Confidence in the CPG recommendation | ||||
| High (%) | – | – | 16 (20) | – |
CPG, clinical practice guideline.