Table 3.
Annual use of DDT by selected individual countries
Country | Year | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | |
Botswana | a | 0 | 6 | 0 | b | |||||||||
Eritrea | 7 | 6 | 13 | 8 | 12a | 16 | 27 | 31 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ethiopia | 274 | 299 | 272 a | 311 | 327 | 406 | 1200 | 1200 | 1350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Gambia | a | 17 | 11 | 11 | b | |||||||||
India | 4893 | 4273 | 5243 | 5092 | 5092 | 3731a | 3413 | 3000 | 3415 | 3347 | 3223 | 3211 | 3091 | 3092 |
Korea, DPR | a | 190 | 179 | 166 | 160 | |||||||||
Madagascar | 0 | 60 | 40 | 30 | 0 a | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mauritius | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 a | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Morocco | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 a | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Mozambique | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 366a | 82 | 201 | 143 | 300 | 150 | 98 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
Myanmar | 8 | 1 | 3 | 2a | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Namibia | 53 | 95 | 48 | 31 | 48a | 61 | 88 | 23 | 92 | b | ||||
Solomon Islands | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1a | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
South Africa | 11 | 5 a | 54 | 62 | 65 | 75 | 73 | 59 | 64 | 16 | 47 | 24 | 30 | 18 |
Sudan | 75 | 75 | 75 | a | ||||||||||
Swaziland | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 8a | 7 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 4 | b | ||
Uganda | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0a | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Zambia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 42 | 0a | 23 | 33 | 24 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Zimbabwe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 96 | 61 | 44 | 97 | 61 | a | b |
Use expressed in metric tons of active ingredient. Data in italic font are from the DDT questionnaires. Data in normal font are from WHO’s assessment [13], except for the data for DPR Korea which are taken from the national implementation plan for the Stockholm Convention [12]. Open spaces indicate missing data
aYear of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession of the Stockholm Convention
bCountries for which recent use of DDT has not been reported but indicated by independent data sources