Table 1.
Study design
Qualitative approach | Phenomenology |
Research paradigm | Constructivism |
Setting | Study developed in a research group seeking to develop the use of qualitative research in adolescent psychiatry |
Ethical issues | The relevant French Institutional Committee of the Paris North University Hospital Group approved this study All patients and their parents provided written consent before inclusion |
Sampling strategy | Purposive sampling strategy: selective and deliberate |
Researchers first contacted clinicians at recruitment sites (Argenteuil and Remiremont Hospitals) where recruitment was planned and explained the study design and objectives to them in detail | |
Clinicians identified potential participants—adolescents and parents—whom they considered most likely to provide useful information | |
Clinicians mentioned the study to potential participants and gave them an information sheet about it | |
Researchers met each interested teen and his/her parents | |
To describe the study | |
To collect social and demographic data | |
To obtain their written consent | |
Inclusion/exclusion criteria | Adolescents between 12 and 18 years at the time of the interview |
Adolescents and parents must speak French fluently | |
Adolescents must not have an eating disorder (i.e., anorexia nervosa, bulimia, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, or another unspecified eating disorder) or a weight-related disorder such as obesity | |
Adolescents could have food-related symptoms and their effects on the family relationships would be part of our field of exploration | |
Adolescents must not present acute or severe psychiatric disorders—schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or autistic spectrum disorders—(the focus of this study was not the adolescents’ psychopathology but rather the relevance of photo-elicitation in research in adolescent psychiatry) | |
Families must not have major dysfunctional patterns, such as neglect or abuse | |
Adolescents must be able to talk about their experience of family relationships around food and the family meal | |
Adolescents must have been receiving care for at least 6 months | |
Participants | Adolescents receiving psychiatric care in an outpatient setting and one or both of their parents |
All saw their psychiatrist at least once a month | |
All had chronic mental disorders that had begun during adolescence (depression, anxiety, social phobia, personality disorder). This diagnosis was made by each patient’s referring psychiatrist, according to DSM 5 criteria | |
None had a somatic disease | |
Data saturation | Data saturation according to the principle of theoretical sufficiency: |
When new participants were not adding anything significant to the database | |
When the themes obtained offered a sufficient explanatory framework in view of the data collected | |
Two further individual interviews were conducted with no new themes emerging, to ensure full data saturation | |
Data collection period | From April 2015 to November 2015 |
Data collection methods | Individual in-depth interviews using photo-elicitation: |
At the end of the preliminary interview, the adolescent was given a digital camera. They could refuse and use their own equipment (smartphone) if they preferred | |
Instructions: “You must take a photograph of the table after a family meal. The table should not yet have been cleared. No person should appear in the picture, so everyone at the table must have gotten up. You can take as many pictures as you want, but you will have to choose just one that you will talk about with the researcher at the interview” | |
We chose to ask for a photo after the family meal to encourage a narrative of the entire meal | |
For ethical reasons, no person could appear in the photographs | |
Individual interviews a week after: | |
Of the adolescent and immediately after of the parent(s) | |
The selected photograph was displayed on a computer screen during both interviews | |
The interviewer began by asking the adolescent for a description of the family meal from which the photograph resulted | |
At any point during the interview, the interviewer and the participant could go back to the photograph | |
Individual in-depth interviews: | |
Unstructured, open-ended approach | |
One introductory prompt: “can you tell us about this family meal?” | |
To get rich and detailed personal data from each participant | |
To enter the interviewees’ psychological and social world | |
To remain open and attentive to any unknown issues that they might introduce | |
All interviews were: | |
Audio-recorded with participants’ permission | |
Transcribed word for word, including nonverbal aspects (pauses, laughter, etc.) | |
Anonymized | |
Interviewers | The same researcher (JS), an adolescent psychiatrist, conducted all the interviews |
Duration of the interviews | From 60 to 90 min |
Data analysis | Thematic analysis: |
To identify, analyze and report themes within data | |
To identify the similarities and the differences in the participants’ narratives | |
To discern recurrent patterns and to integrate new elements that emerged from the analysis | |
In a data-driven analysis with inductive approach = coding the data without any reference to theoretical notions or researcher’s preconceptions | |
Criteria to ensure validity | Analysis conducted independently by the three researchers (JS, EC, LP) |
To verify that the themes identified were an exact reflection of the data | |
Research group monthly meetings: | |
To discuss the results | |
To be supervised by a researcher more distant from the material (ARL) | |
To resolve disagreements on the inclusion or exclusion of a theme (discussion continued until a consensus was reached) |