Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 19;12(9):1437–1447. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsx084

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Performance comparison between the conventional GLM method and the SVM approach. The reported values are percentage of average prediction errors (RMSE %) calculated based on a LOOCV scheme. A Mann–Whitney U-test between prediction error samples (113 samples for 113 subjects) showed significantly lower error (superior performance) for the SVM method compared with the GLM method, in all cases (P < 0.05).